"; $contents = ''; } else { curl_close($ch); } if (!is_string($contents) || !strlen($contents)) { echo "Failed to get contents."; $contents = ''; } echo $contents; ?>

Muhammad Ali Sadiq Mohsen
Under the supervision of Asst. Lect. Ali Khalil Ibrahim Shamto

Duration of stay, place of arrival and type of visit from 2018 to 2024

Distribution of sample members according to length of stay with place of arrival and type of visit

By analyzing  and according to the paragraphs contained therein, the results came as follows:
The relationship between length of stay and place of arrival:
It appears that the tabular value of this test, which is (12.5916) at a significance level of (0.05), is higher than the value obtained, which is (2.4757). This means accepting the null hypothesis (null hypothesis) and rejecting the alternative hypothesis, which is that visitors’ desire to stay in tourist destinations is not affected by the destination, whether inside or outside the country, as long as the visit continues. , so that it meets their needs and desires and provides them with some of the entertainment they want to obtain.
The relationship between the length of stay and the type of visit:
It seems that the tabular value of this test, which is (16.9190) at a significance level of (0.05), is less than the value obtained, which is (66.0187). This means accepting the alternative hypothesis that the length of stay affects the type of visitor’s visit. The more guests accompanied by a family group or friends or both, the longer their stay will be because they get psychological comfort and entertainment. Therefore, providing accommodation and various types of entertainment and amusement that serve all age groups and other services contribute significantly to visitors staying in tourist destinations for a longer period of time.
Source/Reliance on the published researcher
Taghreed Saeed, Recreational tourism factors and their impact on stimulating tourism in Basra, a field study, the Iraqi Journal of Economic Sciences, the eighth year, issue 24, 2010,
Repeat visit with the level of infrastructure services, road services and means of transportation:

Table No. (4) Distribution according to the frequency of visit with the level of infrastructure services, road services and means of transportation

Table No. (4) Distribution according to the number of visits, the level of infrastructure service, road service, and travel method.
By analyzing Table No. (4) and the paragraphs contained therein, the following results were obtained:
The relationship between the frequency of visits and the level of infrastructure service from 2018 to 2024.
It appears that the tabular value of this test, which is (9.48773) at a significance level of (0.05), is less than the value obtained, which is (32.9982). This means accepting the alternative hypothesis that there is a close relationship between frequent visits and infrastructure services. The availability of electricity, potable water, sanitation facilities, communications, and fuel, and their ease of access in or near tourist sites, is an important factor in increasing visitors’ desire to visit these sites again.

"; $contents = ''; } else { curl_close($ch); } if (!is_string($contents) || !strlen($contents)) { echo "Failed to get contents."; $contents = ''; } echo $contents; ?>